Skip to main content
SkillTotal

Is Cloudflare MCP server safe?

What Cloudflare MCP server does

This repository contains several MCP servers that connect an MCP client to a Cloudflare account, covering documentation, Workers bindings and builds, observability, containers, Browser Run, Logpush and more, each at its own mcp.cloudflare.com endpoint. It is published in the cloudflare/mcp-server-cloudflare repository. Per the README, the servers can read account configuration, make suggestions and apply those changes for you. Before installing, connect only the specific servers you need, and when you use an API token, grant only the permissions that particular server requires, as the README describes for the Browser Run server.

No malicious indicators - review capabilities before installing
Notable — review in context (a capability is not a malicious indicator):
  • Dangerous MCP tool capability
  • Node.js network egress
  • Delegated authentication (OAuth 2.0 / OIDC)

What to do: Nothing here argues against installing it. Grant the capabilities it lists only if you expect the tool to need them.

Cloudflare MCP server is an MCP server analyzed by SkillTotal's deterministic static scanner. The scan found no malicious indicators. It can: delegated authentication, mcp tools detected and network egress — capabilities are what the code can do, not a verdict on intent. Risk score 0/100 (low).

@cloudflare/mcp-server-cloudflare 1.0.0

GitHub repository, read as an npm package · https://github.com/cloudflare/mcp-server-cloudflare
LOW
0
/ 100 risk score
Snapshot · scanned Nov 13, 2026 · @cloudflare/mcp-server-cloudflare@1.0.0 · engine 1.1.0 / ruleset 100

Get notified when this component changes

Change alerts aren't live yet. Leave your email and we'll let you know when they launch. We use it only for this and delete it on request.

Automated static-analysis result. It can contain false positives and false negatives, and is not a claim about the intent of Cloudflare MCP server's authors. Report a false positive.

Capabilities — what this component can do (not a risk score):
delegated authenticationmcp tools detectednetwork egress

Behavioral traits

How this component maps to the CSA agentic threat model. Descriptive — it never affects the risk score.

Tool surface
Tool Usage
Execution authority
Tool Access Control / Direct Tool Access
Network egress
Interaction & Communication / Direct Communication
Delegated authentication
Tool Execution Context / User Delegated Credentials

Findings (4)

CapabilityDangerous MCP tool capabilitynot scored · severity highST-MCP-DANGEROUS-TOOL

An MCP tool exposes a powerful capability (files, shell, network, browser, or credentials).

context.registerTool(
		'get_leaked_credentials_data',
context.registerTool(
		'container_file_write',
context.registerTool(
		'container_file_read',

Why it matters: Wired into an agent, these grant it real access to your machine — confirm each is required.

Fix: Confirm each powerful tool is required and constrained; broad MCP tools (shell/filesystem/network) grant an agent significant host access.

CapabilityNode.js network egressnot scored · severity mediumST-NET-NODE

The component makes outbound network requests.

fetch(input: RequestInfo | URL, init?: RequestInit<RequestInitCfProperties>): Promise<Response>;
declare function fetch(input: RequestInfo | URL, init?: RequestInit<RequestInitCfProperties>): Promise<Response>;
fetch(request: Request): Response | Promise<Response>;
fetch(input: RequestInfo | URL, init?: RequestInit): Promise<Response>;
fetch(input: RequestInfo | URL, init?: RequestInit): Promise<Response>;
fetch(input: RequestInfo | URL, init?: RequestInit<RequestInitCfProperties>): Promise<Response>;
declare function fetch(input: RequestInfo | URL, init?: RequestInit<RequestInitCfProperties>): Promise<Response>;
fetch(request: Request): Response | Promise<Response>;
fetch(input: RequestInfo | URL, init?: RequestInit): Promise<Response>;
fetch(input: RequestInfo | URL, init?: RequestInit): Promise<Response>;
fetch(input: RequestInfo | URL, init?: RequestInit<RequestInitCfProperties>): Promise<Response>;
declare function fetch(input: RequestInfo | URL, init?: RequestInit<RequestInitCfProperties>): Promise<Response>;
fetch(request: Request): Response | Promise<Response>;
fetch(input: RequestInfo | URL, init?: RequestInit): Promise<Response>;
fetch(input: RequestInfo | URL, init?: RequestInit): Promise<Response>;
fetch(input: RequestInfo | URL, init?: RequestInit<RequestInitCfProperties>): Promise<Response>;
declare function fetch(input: RequestInfo | URL, init?: RequestInit<RequestInitCfProperties>): Promise<Response>;
fetch(request: Request): Response | Promise<Response>;
fetch(input: RequestInfo | URL, init?: RequestInit): Promise<Response>;
fetch(input: RequestInfo | URL, init?: RequestInit): Promise<Response>;
fetch(input: RequestInfo | URL, init?: RequestInit<RequestInitCfProperties>): Promise<Response>;
declare function fetch(input: RequestInfo | URL, init?: RequestInit<RequestInitCfProperties>): Promise<Response>;
fetch(request: Request): Response | Promise<Response>;
fetch(input: RequestInfo | URL, init?: RequestInit): Promise<Response>;
fetch(input: RequestInfo | URL, init?: RequestInit): Promise<Response>;

Why it matters: Usually legitimate, but confirm the destinations are expected and no sensitive data leaves.

Fix: Confirm the destination hosts are expected and that no sensitive data is sent off-host.

CapabilityDelegated authentication (OAuth 2.0 / OIDC)not scored · severity lowST-AUTH-DELEGATED

An OAuth 2.0 / OpenID Connect delegated-authentication flow was detected (authorization-code / refresh-token / token-exchange grant, an OIDC authorize/discovery endpoint or id_token, or a delegation library). Tools authenticate with the end user's delegated, scoped credentials rather than a long-lived embedded service credential. (5 occurrence(s) shown as evidence).

app.get(`/oauth/authorize`, async (c) => {
app.post(`/oauth/authorize`, async (c) => {
authorizeEndpoint: '/oauth/authorize',

Fix: Delegated auth is a lower-blast-radius execution context than an embedded static credential. Confirm the requested scopes are minimal and that tokens are never logged or forwarded off-host.

CapabilityMCP tool surface detectednot scored · severity lowST-MCP-DETECTED

An MCP tool surface (manifest or tool definitions) was found.

Why it matters: Just context — review which tools it offers and their permissions.

Fix: Review the declared MCP tools and their permissions.

How attackers abuse these capabilities

Interactive labs on the attack class behind the rules above. They show the technique, not anything found in Cloudflare MCP server.

Maintain Cloudflare MCP server?

Check the next package before your agent installs it

The free Claude Code plugin scans each npm, PyPI or MCP package with this report's open-source engine before the install command runs. It runs on your machine and needs no account.

Check your own component

Run the same evidence-backed scan on any MCP server, agent skill, or package.

Scan your own component

How we determine this: deterministic static analysis (regex + AST), evidence-anchored, no code execution. Methodology →