Skip to main content
SkillTotal

Is InfraNodus MCP server safe?

No malicious indicators - review capabilities before installing
Notable — review in context (a capability is not a malicious indicator):
  • Node.js shell/command execution
  • Node.js filesystem read
  • Node.js network egress

What to do: Nothing here argues against installing it. Grant the capabilities it lists only if you expect the tool to need them.

InfraNodus MCP server is an MCP server analyzed by SkillTotal's deterministic static scanner. The scan found no malicious indicators. It can: delegated authentication, filesystem read, mcp tools detected, network egress and shell execution — capabilities are what the code can do, not a verdict on intent. Risk score 0/100 (low).

infranodus-mcp-server 1.9.5

GitHub repository, read as an MCP server · https://github.com/infranodus/mcp-server-infranodus
LOW
0
/ 100 risk score
Snapshot · scanned Nov 13, 2026 · infranodus-mcp-server@1.9.5 · engine 1.1.0 / ruleset 100

Get notified when this component changes

Change alerts aren't live yet. Leave your email and we'll let you know when they launch. We use it only for this and delete it on request.

Automated static-analysis result. It can contain false positives and false negatives, and is not a claim about the intent of InfraNodus MCP server's authors. Report a false positive.

Capabilities — what this component can do (not a risk score):
delegated authenticationfilesystem readmcp tools detectednetwork egressshell execution

Behavioral traits

How this component maps to the CSA agentic threat model. Descriptive — it never affects the risk score.

Tool surface
Tool Usage
Execution authority
Tool Access Control / Direct Tool Access
Filesystem reach
Tool Execution Context
Network egress
Interaction & Communication / Direct Communication
Delegated authentication
Tool Execution Context / User Delegated Credentials

Findings (5)

CapabilityNode.js shell/command executionnot scored · severity highST-SHELL-NODE

The component can run operating-system commands or spawn processes.

import { execFileSync } from "node:child_process";

Why it matters: Powerful and often legitimate — confirm the commands aren't built from untrusted input.

Fix: Confirm the command and its arguments are fully controlled and not derived from untrusted input; prefer execFile with an argument array.

CapabilityNode.js filesystem readnot scored · severity mediumST-FS-NODE-READ

The component reads files from disk.

const content = fs.readFileSync(filePath, "utf-8");
return fs.readFileSync(path.resolve(root, candidate), "utf-8");

Why it matters: Usually legitimate, but worth confirming it can't be steered into reading sensitive files.

Fix: Confirm which files are read and that paths cannot be influenced by untrusted input to reach sensitive locations.

CapabilityNode.js network egressnot scored · severity mediumST-NET-NODE

The component makes outbound network requests.

const response = await fetch(`${config.apiBase}${endpoint}`, {
const response = await fetch(`${config.apiBase}${endpoint}`, {
const response = await fetch(`${BRAND_API_BASE}/userId`, {
import * as http from "http";

Why it matters: Usually legitimate, but confirm the destinations are expected and no sensitive data leaves.

Fix: Confirm the destination hosts are expected and that no sensitive data is sent off-host.

CapabilityDelegated authentication (OAuth 2.0 / OIDC)not scored · severity lowST-AUTH-DELEGATED

An OAuth 2.0 / OpenID Connect delegated-authentication flow was detected (authorization-code / refresh-token / token-exchange grant, an OIDC authorize/discovery endpoint or id_token, or a delegation library). Tools authenticate with the end user's delegated, scoped credentials rather than a long-lived embedded service credential. (7 occurrence(s) shown as evidence).

grant_type: "authorization_code";
app.get("/oauth/authorize", (req: Request, res: Response) => {
<form method="POST" action="/oauth/authorize">
"/oauth/authorize",
authorization_endpoint: `${baseUrl}/oauth/authorize`,
app.get("/.well-known/openid-configuration", (req: Request, res: Response) => {
authorization_endpoint: `${baseUrl}/oauth/authorize`,

Fix: Delegated auth is a lower-blast-radius execution context than an embedded static credential. Confirm the requested scopes are minimal and that tokens are never logged or forwarded off-host.

CapabilityMCP tool surface detectednot scored · severity lowST-MCP-DETECTED

An MCP tool surface (manifest or tool definitions) was found.

"mcpServers": {
"mcpServers": {
const transport = new StdioServerTransport();
transport = new StreamableHTTPServerTransport({
const transport = new SSEServerTransport("/message", res);
const mcpServer = new McpServer(serverInfo, {
mcpServer.registerTool(
const transport = new StdioServerTransport();

Why it matters: Just context — review which tools it offers and their permissions.

Fix: Review the declared MCP tools and their permissions.

How attackers abuse these capabilities

Interactive labs on the attack class behind the rules above. They show the technique, not anything found in InfraNodus MCP server.

Maintain InfraNodus MCP server?

Check the next package before your agent installs it

The free Claude Code plugin scans each npm, PyPI or MCP package with this report's open-source engine before the install command runs. It runs on your machine and needs no account.

Check your own component

Run the same evidence-backed scan on any MCP server, agent skill, or package.

Scan your own component

How we determine this: deterministic static analysis (regex + AST), evidence-anchored, no code execution. Methodology →