SkillTotal

Is Infranodus MCP server safe?

No malicious indicators - review capabilities before installing
Notable — review in context (capabilities are not malware):
  • Node.js shell/command execution
  • Node.js filesystem read
  • Node.js network egress

infranodus-mcp-server is an AI npm_package analyzed by SkillTotal's deterministic static scanner. The scan found no malicious indicators, though 5 risky constructs are reported for review. It can: delegated authentication, filesystem read, mcp tools detected, network egress and shell execution — capabilities are what the code can do, not a verdict on intent. Risk score 0/100 (low).

infranodus-mcp-server 1.7.3

npm_package · https://github.com/infranodus/mcp-server-infranodus
LOW
0
/ 100 risk score
Snapshot · scanned Aug 10, 2026 · infranodus-mcp-server@1.7.3 · engine 0.38.1 / ruleset 42

Automated static-analysis result. It can contain false positives and false negatives, and is not a claim about the intent of Infranodus MCP server's authors. Report a false positive.

Capabilities — what this component can do (not a risk score):
delegated authenticationfilesystem readmcp tools detectednetwork egressshell execution

Behavioral traits

How this component maps to the CSA agentic threat model. Descriptive — it never affects the risk score.

Tool surface
Tool Usage
Execution authority
Tool Access Control / Direct Tool Access
Filesystem reach
Tool Execution Context
Network egress
Interaction & Communication / Direct Communication
Delegated authentication
Tool Execution Context / User Delegated Credentials

Findings (5)

HIGHNode.js shell/command executionST-SHELL-NODE

The component can run operating-system commands or spawn processes.

import { execFileSync } from "node:child_process";

Why it matters: Powerful and often legitimate — confirm the commands aren't built from untrusted input.

Fix: Confirm the command and its arguments are fully controlled and not derived from untrusted input; prefer execFile with an argument array.

MEDIUMNode.js filesystem readST-FS-NODE-READ

The component reads files from disk.

const content = fs.readFileSync(filePath, "utf-8");
return fs.readFileSync(path.resolve(root, candidate), "utf-8");

Why it matters: Usually legitimate, but worth confirming it can't be steered into reading sensitive files.

Fix: Confirm which files are read and that paths cannot be influenced by untrusted input to reach sensitive locations.

MEDIUMNode.js network egressST-NET-NODE

The component makes outbound network requests.

const response = await fetch(`${config.apiBase}${endpoint}`, {
const response = await fetch(`${BRAND_API_BASE}/userId`, {

Why it matters: Usually legitimate, but confirm the destinations are expected and no sensitive data leaves.

Fix: Confirm the destination hosts are expected and that no sensitive data is sent off-host.

LOWDelegated authentication (OAuth 2.0 / OIDC)ST-AUTH-DELEGATED

An OAuth 2.0 / OpenID Connect delegated-authentication flow was detected (authorization-code / refresh-token / token-exchange grant, an OIDC authorize/discovery endpoint or id_token, or a delegation library). Tools authenticate with the end user's delegated, scoped credentials rather than a long-lived embedded service credential. (10 occurrence(s) shown as evidence).

grant_type: "authorization_code";
* GET /oauth/authorize - Authorization endpoint (shows form)
app.get("/oauth/authorize", (req: Request, res: Response) => {
<form method="POST" action="/oauth/authorize">
* POST /oauth/authorize - Process authorization (form submission)
authorization_endpoint: `${baseUrl}/oauth/authorize`,
* GET /.well-known/openid-configuration - OpenID Connect Discovery (some clients check this)
app.get("/.well-known/openid-configuration", (req: Request, res: Response) => {
authorization_endpoint: `${baseUrl}/oauth/authorize`,

Fix: Delegated auth is a lower-blast-radius execution context than an embedded static credential. Confirm the requested scopes are minimal and that tokens are never logged or forwarded off-host.

LOWMCP tool surface detectedST-MCP-DETECTED

An MCP tool surface (manifest or tool definitions) was found.

mcpServer.registerTool(

Why it matters: Just context — review which tools it offers and their permissions.

Fix: Review the declared MCP tools and their permissions.

Check your own component

Run the same evidence-backed scan on any MCP server, agent skill, or package.

Scan your own component

How we determine this: deterministic static analysis (regex + AST), evidence-anchored, no code execution. Methodology →