SkillTotal

Is Shuorenhua safe?

No malicious indicators - review capabilities before installing
Notable — review in context (capabilities are not malware):
  • Python shell/command execution
  • Python dynamic code execution
  • Python filesystem read

repo is an AI agent_skill analyzed by SkillTotal's deterministic static scanner. The scan found no malicious indicators, though 5 risky constructs are reported for review. It can: dynamic code execution, filesystem read, filesystem write, network egress and shell execution — capabilities are what the code can do, not a verdict on intent. Risk score 0/100 (low).

repo

agent_skill · https://github.com/MrGeDiao/shuorenhua
LOW
0
/ 100 risk score
Snapshot · scanned Sep 27, 2026 · repo@9e6400d · engine 0.53.0 / ruleset 60

Automated static-analysis result. It can contain false positives and false negatives, and is not a claim about the intent of Shuorenhua's authors. Report a false positive.

Capabilities — what this component can do (not a risk score):
dynamic code executionfilesystem readfilesystem writenetwork egressshell execution

Behavioral traits

How this component maps to the CSA agentic threat model. Descriptive — it never affects the risk score.

Execution authority
Tool Access Control / Direct Tool Access
Filesystem reach
Tool Execution Context
Network egress
Interaction & Communication / Direct Communication

Findings (5)

HIGHPython dynamic code executionST-DYN-PY

The code turns strings into live code at runtime (eval / new Function / exec).

exec(compile(source, str(path), "exec"), module.__dict__)

Why it matters: If those strings aren't fixed and trusted, they become a way to run arbitrary code.

Fix: Avoid evaluating dynamically constructed code; if unavoidable, ensure the input is a trusted constant and never derived from external data.

HIGHPython shell/command executionST-SHELL-PY

The component can run operating-system commands or spawn processes.

result = subprocess.run(
        [sys.executable, str(script), "--check"],
        cwd=ROOT,
        capture_output=True,
        text=True,
        check=False,
    )
proc = subprocess.run(command, cwd=attempt, input=(attempt / "prompt.txt").read_bytes() if plan["provider"] == "claude" else b"",
                                          stdout=out, stderr=err, timeout=plan["timeout_seconds"], env=env)
out = subprocess.run(
            ["gh", "api", "graphql", "-f", f"query={query}"],
            stdout=subprocess.PIPE, text=True, check=True).stdout

Why it matters: Powerful and often legitimate — confirm the commands aren't built from untrusted input.

Fix: Confirm the command and its arguments are fully controlled and not derived from untrusted input; avoid shell=True.

MEDIUMPython filesystem readST-FS-PY-READ

The component reads files from disk.

return (ROOT / relative).read_text(encoding="utf-8")
benchmark = read_text("evals/benchmark.md", issues, "counts")
samples = read_text("evals/real-samples.md", issues, "counts")
text = read_text(relative, issues, "counts") or ""
files.append((relative_text, path.read_text(encoding="utf-8")))
payload = json.loads(manifest.read_text(encoding="utf-8"))
text = candidate.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
text = read_text(relative, issues, "legacy")
actual = hashlib.sha256(snapshot.read_bytes()).hexdigest()
skill = read_text("SKILL.md", issues, "meta")
text = read_text(relative, issues, "meta")
text = read_text(target, issues, "human-corpus")
source = path.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
text = read_text(relative, issues, "rule-tables")
text = path.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
blocks = extract_blocks(path.read_text(encoding="utf-8"))
results.append(analyze_case(cid, scene, quote, output_text, path.read_text(encoding="utf-8")))
raw = manifest.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
body_bytes = body_path.read_bytes()
return Path(path).read_text(encoding="utf-8")
cases = parse_cases(src.read_text(encoding="utf-8"))
if not path.is_file() or path.read_bytes() != expected.encode("utf-8")
value = strict_json(Path(path).read_text(encoding="utf-8"))
with Path(path).open("xb") as stream:

Why it matters: Usually legitimate, but worth confirming it can't be steered into reading sensitive files.

Fix: Confirm which files are read and that paths cannot be influenced by untrusted input to reach sensitive locations.

MEDIUMPython filesystem write/deleteST-FS-PY-WRITE

The component writes or deletes files on disk.

md_path.write_text("\n".join(header).rstrip() + "\n", encoding="utf-8")
json_path.write_text(
        json.dumps({"reports": model_reports, "cases": file_results}, ensure_ascii=False, indent=2) + "\n",
        encoding="utf-8",
    )
path.write_text(text, encoding="utf-8")
shutil.rmtree(fake_home, ignore_errors=True)
out.write_text(svg, encoding="utf-8")

Why it matters: Usually legitimate, but worth confirming the paths can't be controlled by untrusted input.

Fix: Confirm which files are written/deleted and that paths cannot be influenced by untrusted input.

MEDIUMPython network egressST-NET-PY

The component makes outbound network requests.

url = f"{base_url}/w/api.php?{urllib.parse.urlencode(params)}"
request = urllib.request.Request(
        url,
        headers={"User-Agent": "shuorenhua-human-corpus/2.3.1 (fixed-revision extractor)"},
    )
with urllib.request.urlopen(request, timeout=30) as response:

Why it matters: Usually legitimate, but confirm the destinations are expected and no sensitive data leaves.

Fix: Confirm the destination hosts are expected and that no sensitive data is sent off-host.

Check your own component

Run the same evidence-backed scan on any MCP server, agent skill, or package.

Scan your own component

How we determine this: deterministic static analysis (regex + AST), evidence-anchored, no code execution. Methodology →